For one sprint, switch planning styles: one group stacks tightly scheduled blocks, the other batches work with fluid checkpoints. Compare stress, creativity, and throughput. Conclude by blending both methods into shared protocols that tolerate variability while protecting deep-focus windows and predictable collaboration touchpoints.
Practice three decision modes—consultative, consent-based, and directive—on the same scenario. Rotate deciders, timebox discussion, and document criteria. Track how speed, buy-in, and accountability shift. Use findings to design a decision charter that clarifies when each mode is appropriate and who announces outcomes.
Build a lightweight RACI for an urgent cross-border deliverable, then simulate timezone handoffs in fifteen-minute increments. Note where responsibility blurs and approvals bottleneck. Adjust roles, add buffers, and standardize checklists so future projects move smoothly even when delays or absences inevitably appear.
Collect phrases that trigger defensiveness, like “obviously” or “as usual.” Practice pausing, naming your reaction, and restating the observation with neutral, specific language. Use role-play to feel the shift in tone, then codify go-to reframes your team can reference during heated moments.
Build a deck of respectful questions that invite context: what would success look like at your last company, how is urgency signaled on your team, when is directness appreciated or avoided? Draw three cards during disagreements to reveal hidden assumptions and broaden options.
Right after a difficult cross-border project, run a short retrospective that separates facts, feelings, and forward experiments. Assign facilitators from different regions to balance perspectives. Capture one behavior to stop, start, and continue, and commit to checking progress publicly in thirty days.